![]() ![]() Knowingly or intentionally intercepting a communication in violation of Indiana’s interception law is a felony punishable by one to six years in prison and a $10,000 fine. The voyeurism law also prohibits the use of drones to secretly record images or audio of people in their residences or on the land around their residences if they are in a location not visible by the public. Additionally, the voyeurism law makes it a misdemeanor to record images of the private bodily areas of a person without consent. The state’s video voyeurism law makes it a felony to secretly record images-either still or video-inside the dwelling of another person or inside areas where occupants might be expected to disrobe, such as restrooms and dressing rooms, without the occupants’ consent. Under Indiana’s surveillance law, it is a misdemeanor for one to place a camera or other equipment that records “images or data of any kind while unattended on the private property of another person” without that person’s consent. § 35-31.5-2-176, -33.5-5-5(b).īecause the provision of the statute dealing with electronic communications applies to “any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, oral communication, digital information, or intelligence of any nature” made “by a wire, a radio, or an electromagnetic, a photoelectronic, or a photo-optical system,” consent likewise is required from at least one party to disclose the contents of text or email messages sent between wireless devices. The statute makes it a felony to intercept or record any telephone or electronic communication using a device unless at least one party gives their consent. It is unclear if “data of any kind” would include the contents of oral conversations. Indiana’s separate surveillance statute, however, makes it a misdemeanor for a person to record “images or data of any kind” with a camera or other device while unattended on the private property of another person without that person’s consent. The state’s interception statute does not address the recording of in-person conversations. ![]() Violators can face both civil and criminal penalties. The state also prohibits disclosure of images intercepted in violation of its video voyeurism law. It is not clear whether a journalist also needs at least one party’s consent before recording in-person conversations. Indiana bars the recording or interception of any telephonic or electronic communication without the consent of at least one party to the conversation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |